M.R. Vinoda v. M.S. Susheelamma
- Vaishnavi Majji
- Oct 17
- 1 min read
In the case of M.R. Vinoda v. M.S. Susheelamma (2021 INSC 878), the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India reaffirmed key principles of Hindu joint family law, particularly the powers of a Karta and the applicability of limitation in challenging property transactions.
Background
The case arose from a 1969 relinquishment deed executed by the Karta of a Hindu joint family, M.R. Rajashekar, transferring the interests of his two younger brothers, one of whom was a minor at the time, in certain ancestral properties. The deed was intended to facilitate the repayment of family debts. The validity of the transaction was challenged 24 years later by the brothers, who contended that the Karta lacked authority to act on behalf of a minor coparcener.
Legal Issues
Whether a Karta can validly relinquish the rights of minor coparceners?
Whether the suit was barred by limitation?
Judgment
The Hon’ble Supreme Court held that under Mitakshara Hindu law, a Karta is legally empowered to alienate or relinquish joint family property, including the interest of minor coparceners, provided the transaction is for legal necessity or the benefit of the estate. The Court also ruled that the suit was time-barred under Articles 58, 59, and 109 of the Limitation Act, 1963, which prescribe three years for such claims. This ruling underscores the Karta’s authority in managing family property and emphasizes the need for timely legal action in matters involving ancestral assets.
Source
Comments