While transgender individuals have a long-standing presence in Indian society, they continue to experience marginalization and discrimination. This is largely due to their gender identities falling outside the traditional binary of male and female.
Accurate data collection on transgender populations in India has been historically challenging. It was not until 2011 that the national census included an "other" category for gender identification, leading to more inclusive data collection.
Despite progressive legal reforms aimed at inclusivity, transgender individuals in India still face barriers to accessing financial resources and property rights due to persistent discrimination and inadequate policy enforcement.

Legal Rights of Transgender Individuals in India
In the landmark case NALSA v. Union of India (AIR 2014 SC 1863), the Supreme Court of India officially recognized non-binary gender identity, affirming the fundamental rights of transgender individuals. This ruling mandated the Government of India to implement measures protecting these rights and interests, specifically addressing reservations in employment and education, as well as the right to own property and assets.
Following this landmark judgment, the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019 (TPA) was enacted. This legislation prohibits discrimination against transgender individuals with respect to their right to reside in, purchase, rent, or otherwise occupy any property.
Inheritance Rights of Transgender Individuals in India
Despite legal progress, neither the NALSA judgment of 2014 nor the TPA of 2019 explicitly addresses inheritance rights for transgender individuals. This lack of clarity creates a dual challenge: establishing inheritance rights, as existing laws often operate within a gender binary framework, and determining legal successors in cases of intestate death.
The 2005 case of Ajay Mafatlal (formerly Aparna Mafatlal), one of India's first sex reassignment surgery patients, highlighted these complexities. The controversy surrounding the case, with accusations of a sex change undertaken to claim paternal property, underscores the difficulties faced by individuals navigating patriarchal gender norms and the resulting social ostracization.
Inheritance laws in India remain governed by personal laws based on religion and often outdated cultural practices, necessitating reform to reflect evolving legal and policy landscapes. While the Indian Succession Act of 1925 uses seemingly gender-neutral terms like "kindred" and "lineal descendants", its descriptions of legal heirs remain ambiguous and lean towards traditional gender binaries. Similarly, the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 and the Muslim Personal Law (Shariat Application) Act, 1937 define heirs and orders of succession within a binary gender framework.
Conclusion
While recent years have witnessed significant strides in addressing discrimination against transgender individuals and promoting inclusive policies and legislation in India, including the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code (Amendment) Act, 2020, which recognizes transgender individuals as family members for land ownership and succession rights, implementation of such progressive measures remains limited. Inheritance laws concerning transgender individuals in India continue to lack clarity.
Despite these challenges, proactive measures can safeguard the inheritance rights of transgender loved ones. Creating a will that explicitly names them as beneficiaries ensures their rightful inheritance, eliminating potential ambiguity and contestation.
We, at You Are Ensured, offer a streamlined and secure platform for creating wills from the convenience of one's home.

Comments